The Critical Rationalist Vol. 01 No. 04 ISSN: 1393-3809 31-Dec-1996
(41) I hope it is clear that each of these theses, which are collectively claimed to compose , makes empirical claims that are potentially testable: each of them could, potentially, be mistaken. Of course, actually carrying out severe tests is difficult (to put it mildly). Popper put the situation thus:
...Darwin's own most important contribution to the theory of evolution, his theory of natural selection, is difficult to test. There are some tests, even some experimental tests; and in some cases, such as the famous phenomenon known as "industrial melanism", we can observe natural selection happening under our very eyes, as it were. Nevertheless, really severe tests of the theory of natural selection are hard to come by, much more so than tests of otherwise comparable theories in physics or chemistry.
(42) Nonetheless, for the purposes of this article, I am concerned only to show that the theory has empirical content, and does--if accepted--solve its problem ( ). Thus, as with the theory of common descent, I shall now (tentatively) adopt , the theory of Organismic Darwinism, as true.
The Critical Rationalist Vol. 01 No. 04 ISSN: 1393-3809 31-Dec-1996
Copyright © 1996 All Rights Reserved.
TCR Issue Timestamp: Tue Dec 31 17:37:08 GMT 1996